| 193 | 4 | 127 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
当前,仲裁机制被频繁适用,但对其的规制却乏力:仲裁机构仲裁时审查把关不够严格,人民法院对仲裁审查时间滞后且范围有限,检察机关对仲裁的监督主要是通过监督法院的执行行为来间接实现的,监督效能不足,易引发虚假仲裁。为避免具有严重社会危害性、影响仲裁公信力、损害法律权威的虚假仲裁发生,需要对其进行及时、有效的规制。检察机关是法律监督机关,加强其在仲裁中的监督作用发挥以杜绝虚假仲裁的发生具有法律和实践层面的可行性。为确保仲裁中检察机关准确、全面实施监督,可将全面、准确获取仲裁信息,解决虚假仲裁线索发现难的问题;理性对待私权自治,确保客观认定虚假仲裁;确保及时监督,避免司法资源浪费;降低仲裁监督对当事人合意性的影响等设定为目标任务。为此,可以采取通过立法的方式将检察机关纳入仲裁参与人的范畴,秉持审慎态度对仲裁进行有限监督,采用合理怀疑标准对仲裁过程中可能发生的虚假仲裁进行识别与认定,在强化调查核实权以确保证据真实可靠的情况下,由检察机关制发检察建议至仲裁机构、公安机关、中国人民银行等相关单位,以及时制止或惩戒虚假仲裁的方式实现上述目标任务。
Abstract:At present, the arbitration mechanism is frequently applied, but the regulation of arbitration is weak: the review and control of arbitration institutions are not strict enough during arbitration, the people's courts have a delayed and limited scope of arbitration review, and the supervision of arbitration by the procuratorial organs is mainly indirectly achieved through supervising the enforcement actions of the courts, resulting in insufficient supervision efficiency. To avoid the occurrence of false arbitration behaviors that have serious social harm, affect the credibility of arbitration, and damage legal authority, it is necessary to regulate them in a timely and effective manner. The procuratorial organs are legal supervisory organs, and strengthening their supervision in arbitration to prevent the occurrence of false arbitration has legal and practical feasibility. To ensure accurate and comprehensive supervision by the procuratorial organs in arbitration, it is possible to obtain comprehensive and accurate arbitration information to solve the problem of difficulty in discovering false arbitration leads; Eliminate the concept of unlimited promotion of private autonomy and ensure objective identification of false arbitration; Ensure timely supervision and avoid wasting judicial resources; The goal task is to reduce the impact of arbitration supervision on the agreement of the parties involved. To this end, the procuratorial organ can be included in the category of arbitration participants by means of legislation, conduct limited supervision over arbitration with a prudent attitude, identify and identify possible false arbitrations in the process of arbitration with the standard of reasonable doubt, and under the condition of strengthening the power of investigation and verification to ensure the authenticity and reliability of evidence, the procuratorial organ will formulate and issue procuratorial recommendations to arbitration institutions, public security organs, the People's Bank of China and other relevant units to achieve the above goals and tasks in a timely manner to stop or punish false arbitrations.
[1]徐艳红.加强检察机关对仲裁活动的法律监督“很有必要”——访全国政协委员、中国人民大学法学院教授汤维建[N].人民政协报,2022-09-27.
[2]胡思博,李英辉.检察机关打击虚假仲裁的现实必要性与程序设计[J].中州学刊,2021(12):57-61.
[3]黄杰文,朱腾飞.虚假仲裁检察监督路径探析[J].人民检察,2021(7):74-75.
[4]刘建新、王冰.检察机关监督治理虚假仲裁的理论证成与完善进路[J].政法学刊,2024,41(2):89-96.
[5]王振友.虚假诉讼检察监督[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2021:180.
[6]丁瑶.数字检察视域下虚假仲裁法律监督理论拓补与路径构造[J].兰州学刊,2024(5):120-129.
[7]王贵生,马韶.破解虚假商事仲裁检察监督实践难题[J].中国检察官,2023(13):54-57.
[8]姜丽丽.《仲裁法》修订重大争议问题及其理论溯源[J].中国法律评论,2024(3):165-185.
[9]朱孝清.司法的亲历性[J].中外法学,2015,27(4):919-937.
[10]潘志玉.虚假诉讼检察监督职能再定位[J].政法论丛,2023(2):149-160.
[11]车浩.立法论与解释论的顺位之争——以收买被拐卖的妇女罪为例[J].现代法学,2023,45(2):175-196.
[12]姚辉.当理想照进现实:从立法论迈向解释论[J].清华法学,2020,14(3):46-62.
[13]林彦.国家权力的横向配置结构[J].法学家,2018(5):29-43+192-193.
[14]章尚锦.国际私法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2019:305.
[15]田有赫.国内仲裁法律适用[M].北京:法律出版社,2018:30.
[16][德]卡尔.拉伦茨.法学方法论(全本·第六版)[M].黄家镇,译.北京:商务印书馆,2020:277.
[17]张建伟.比较法视野下检察机关的主导作用[J].国家检察官学院学报,2022,30(1):56-79.
[18]张杰.检察机关法律监督刚性视域下的调查核实权[J].政法论坛,2023,41(3):95-105.
[19]朱孝清,张智辉.检察学[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2010:320.
(1)有学者对J省Y市自2018-2023年可能涉仲裁罪名进行了分析,发现检察机关审查起诉执行判决裁定滥用职权罪、判决裁定失职罪、枉法仲裁罪均为0件0人,以虚假诉讼罪起诉案件8件,妨害作证罪起诉案件1件,均无仲裁相关案件。数据来源:娄云,王敏利.虚假劳动争议调解检察监督的实践困境与纾解[J].中国检察官,2023(7).
(2)以最高人民检察院第六检察厅于2023年4月印发虚假仲裁、虚假公证监督典型案例中的某融资担保公司虚假仲裁监督案为例,该案中,某仲裁委原仲裁员刘某明与法院执行局人员马某滨、当事人汪某合谋串通,将案件通过不正当手段分配到自己名下,并在各还款义务人均未参加仲裁庭审的情况下,作为独任仲裁员审理案件并出具4份仲裁裁决书,裁决王某阁向某融资担保公司偿还代偿款。
(3)据统计,2021年,全国270家仲裁机构共办理案件415889件,法院裁定撤销仲裁裁决50件,占比0.01%;裁定不予执行仲裁裁决83件,占比0.02%。2022年,全国277家仲裁机构共办理案件475173件,法院裁定撤销仲裁裁决120件,占比0.02%;裁定不予执行仲裁裁决141件,占比0.03%。数据来源于司法部公共法律服务管理局统计的全国仲裁办理案件情况。本文将撤销或不予执行仲裁裁决的案件数量进行罗列并作简单的比例计算,不难看出撤销或不予执行仲裁裁决案件数量少、占比低。
(4)执行监督的启动方式也可能是检察机关依职权启动,由于在执行过程中,案件卷宗尚未最终形成,直接介入监督的可行性偏低,在实践中多表现为案件呈执行完毕或执行终结状态时,检察机关再依托于专项行动进行监督,该类监督方式也涉及到执行回转的问题。
(5)案例来源于最高人民检察院第六检察厅2023年4月印发的有关虚假仲裁、虚假公证监督典型案例。
(6)但应当注意地是实现各部门所有业务数据对接,势必有所阻力,非一日之功。
基本信息:
DOI:10.16022/j.cnki.cn51-1716/d.2024.04.003
中图分类号:D926.3;D925.7
引用信息:
[1]李同民,郭瀚.仲裁中检察监督的目标及其实现路径[J].四川警察学院学报,2024,36(04):65-72.DOI:10.16022/j.cnki.cn51-1716/d.2024.04.003.
2024-08-10
2024-08-10