四川警察学院学报

监察体制改革后，职务犯罪案件转由监察调查，由此形成了监察调查-审查起诉追诉模式。因此，需要监察调查与审查起诉管辖进行精准衔接来完成案件的移送。然而,以“人”为中心的监察调查管辖与以“案”为中心的刑事审查起诉管辖存在的差异,监察调查与刑事诉讼程序设置理念的差异,监察调查与刑事诉讼程序的分离，这些因素导致了两者在衔接过程中存在级别管辖、地域管辖、指定管辖和移送管辖等方面的不协调。监察调查与审查起诉管辖衔接的完善路径应当通过四个方面来实现，一是通过内部协调和预先移送化解级别管辖衔接冲突，二是通过“分级管理为原则、辅助以协商解决”弥合地域管辖衔接壁垒，三是通过沟通协商机制与统一规范促进指定管辖衔接，四是通过合理适用移送机制保障移送管辖衔接。

After the reform of supervision system,the cases of duty crimes were transferred to supervision investigation,thus forming a mode of supervision investigation to prosecution. Therefore,a precise jurisdiction connection between supervisory investigation and prosecution is needed to complete the case transfer. However,jurisdiction difference between people-centered supervisory investigation and case-centered criminal prosecution,concept difference between supervisory investigation and criminal procedure,and the separation of supervisory investigation and criminal procedure lead to overall incongruity of level jurisdiction,region jurisdiction,designation jurisdiction and transfer jurisdiction. It is suggested to solve the problems through four aspects. First,the conflict of the connection between jurisdiction levels should be resolved through internal coordination and advance transfer. Second,the connection barriers between jurisdiction regions should be resolved through hierarchical management as the principle and assisted by consultation. Third,designated jurisdiction connection should be promoted through communication and consultation mechanism and unified norms. Fourth,transfer jurisdiction connection should be ensured through reasonable application of transfer mechanism.